Answer:
and
.
Step-by-step explanation:
So I believe the problem is this:

where we are asked to find values for
and
such that the equation holds for any
in the equation's domain.
So I'm actually going to get rid of any domain restrictions by multiplying both sides by (x-3)(x+7).
In other words this will clear the fractions.


As you can see there was some cancellation.
I'm going to plug in -7 for x because x+7 becomes 0 then.




Divide both sides by -10:


Now we have:
with 
I notice that x-3 is 0 when x=3. So I'm going to replace x with 3.




Divide both sides by 10:


So
and
.
Answer:30
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
54+61
Step-by-step explanation:
54 + 61 = 115
61 - 54 = 7
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs.
here obs.T=1.879

we accept
at 5% level of significance.
i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.
1.
this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.
Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.
we assume that
independently
We want to test 
define 
now 
the hypothesis becomes

in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before
i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .