Here is the information you wanted about . . . is a forceful and efficient way to open a message responding to an inquiry. This statement is True.
<h3>What is inquiry explain?</h3>
- Any procedure that aims to increase information, dispel doubt, or find a solution to an issue is called an inquiry.
- A theory of inquiry describes the various types of inquiry and discusses how each style of inquiry accomplishes its goal.
<h3>What is Efficiency?</h3>
- Efficiency is the ability to achieve something or get a desired outcome without wasting resources, time, money, energy, or effort.
- In a broader sense, it is the capacity to carry out tasks effectively and efficiently.
- Efficiency is, in Deborah Stone's words, "so not a goal in and of itself.
- We want it because it will help us get more of the things we value rather than because we want it for its own sake."
- It denotes the degree of performance that requires the fewest inputs to provide the greatest amount of output in more mathematical or scientific words.
Learn more about Efficiency here:
brainly.com/question/13828557
#SPJ4
Answer:
No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.
d. deductive invalid
Explanation:
- The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
- Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
- In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
- So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
according to the article, more people means more food, more food means more land, more land means less trees. So basically they cut trees to clear land for cattle and crops. So, they need more space for their cattle because there is more people, which means, more mouths to feed.
Answer: unreliability
Explanation: Some of the problems that determine the quality of an experiment are reliability and validity.
Reliability considers the consistency of the experiment. In the example above, the result of the second sample is inconsistent with the result of the first sample, making Watt's research unreliable. That is, it does not reflect the ratings of a larger population. This problem can be solved by increasing the sample size, such that the average ratings are more reflective of a wider audience.
Validity considers the accuracy of the experiment. A lack of reliability of an experiment will likely make the result invalid as well, but this is not always the case.