1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
14

What effect did the Korean War have on the governments of North Korea and South Korea?

History
2 answers:
zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago
8 0
I would say D, because after the war the north stayed a communist nation ,and the south didn't change into any of the listed <span />
Nana76 [90]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is D. The Korean War did not change the governments of North Korea and South Korea.

Explanation:

The Korean War was a war between South Korea under Syngman Rhee supported by troops from several western countries and North Korea under Kim Il-Sung with the support of troops from the People's Republic of China.

The war began as skirmishes on the border between north and south. Elections in South Korea were held in May 1950. North supporters did not do well, and North Korea demanded that the elections be re-run. The South refused and on 25 June 1950 North Korean troops moved south to try to reunite the country. The fighting continued until the truce on 27 July 1953.

The North's army had rapid successes, and South Korean troops were forced to retreat. The city of Seoul was occupied by the North Korean army on June 28. A resolution was passed at the United Nations calling on North Korea to retreat from the south. At the time, the USSR had decided not to take part in the United Nations, so could not stop the decision to provide military aid to South Korea. United States troops were the largest contingent of the war, but it was also formed by the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, France, South Africa, Turkey, Thailand, Greece, Holland, Ethiopia, Colombia, the Philippines, Belgium, and Luxembourg.  

At first, the number of US troops was not large, and they were defeated at Osan on 5 July. By August, the south only occupied a small territory in the southeast around Pusan. They managed to hold on to Pusan ​​after a hard fight. More UN troops arrived, and there was heavy bombing by US aircraft. On 15 September they attacked with a landing at Inchon, and Seoul was captured back to South Korea. The troops of the north had to retreat, and the southern and UN forces moved north, with the intention of uniting all of Korea under the government of Syngman Rhee.

As they approached China's border, the Chinese government warned them that it would take part in the war. On 19 October the Chinese troops moved to the border, and on 1 November 1950 they collided with the US forces. South Korean and US troops were forced to retreat south. On 4 January 1951 Seoul was captured by the Chinese army. The city was re-occupied by the United States on March 14. The Communists were eventually sent back to the border between North and South Korea.

From October 1951 to July 1953 the fighting continued without much change in the territory occupied by both sides. Peace talks continued for two years, in Kaesong and then in Panmunjon. A ceasefire was agreed on 27 July 1953, in which a status quo ante bellum was agreed, which meant the consolidation of both North Korea and South Korea in their respective territories.

You might be interested in
History help k12 asap pls Was Congress correct in approving the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?
Afina-wow [57]
You'll need to choose which thesis to argue.  I'll provide you with some of the background info and thoughts.

The incident in the Gulf of Tonkin involved an attack and an alleged attack on US destroyers by North Vietnamese forces in August, 1964.  On August 2, the USS Maddox was pursued by North Vietnamese torpedo boats.  The Maddox fired warning shots, and the North Vietnamese then attacked with torpedoes and machine gun fire.  The US suffered only minor and no casualties; the North Vietnamese boats were damaged and they suffered several casualties.  On August 4, there was a report of a second Tonkin Gulf incident was alleged, but this later was revealed as a false report.  Nevertheless, the American public was told of two attacks and the incidents were used to get Congress to pass the Tonkin Gulf resolution, which gave the President open-ended powers to deploy troops in the military effort in Vietnam.

The resolution had significant consequences for the Vietnam War and beyond that time.  In regard to the Vietnam War, it provided the justification for the president, Lyndon Johnson, to escalate US involvement in the war and magnify the number of US troops there by hundreds of thousands.  In US foreign policy in general, it represented an increase of the power of the Commander in Chief (the president) to deploy troops without getting formal approval in advance from Congress.

So for your thesis, you'll need to decide if you believe Congress should have retained more direct authority over the US of American forces in times of conflict, or if you support the idea of the President having greater ability to command the military's deployment on an as-needed basis.  Response time is more agile and quick in the hands of the President, but there's less check and balance than having matters vetted through Congress before committing to US action.
4 0
3 years ago
"Thousands of puritans arrived in Massachusetts bay as they fled persecution in England" which term is accosiated with this even
Readme [11.4K]
The term that would be associated with this event is "colonization", since in fleeing persecution and coming to North America to form a new life on new land, these Puritans were forming a colony. 
6 0
3 years ago
What are two main causes of the bitter rivalry between the Ottoman and Safavid empires?
Anestetic [448]
<span>The Ottomans and Safavids have fought each other mainly because the Ottomans were Sunni Muslim and the Safavids were Shiite Muslim. They also fought each other because expanding borders is part of what sustains the economy of these two empires. As a result of conflict between these two empires, each empire's economy was depleted because it spent so much on wars that ended up not helping the empire in any way. This partially contributed to the decline of these two empires. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
In the US before 1800, which of the following characteristics was NOT a typical requirement for voters?
hammer [34]

Answer: B

Explanation:

Women weren’t allowed to vote until the 1900s

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why has the Supreme Court upheld laws that require advantage notice and permits for protest in public places
den301095 [7]

Answer:

I believe it to be D. Hope this helps!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • wich was not a reason johnson used when vetoing the extension of the freedmens bureau and civil rights bill of 1866
    7·1 answer
  • In which of the following two ways did the Roman empire differ from the Roman republic? Select all that apply.
    14·1 answer
  • The main economic problem facing most African countries is _____.
    13·1 answer
  • The Cabinet is part of which branch of the federal government?
    8·1 answer
  • Which event led the british government to shut down the east india company and rule india directly?
    12·2 answers
  • Identify the part of government created by the Constitution that the excerpt focuses on and explain Brutus’ criticism of that pa
    12·1 answer
  • Which important economic concept dealing with the self-regulating nature of the marketplace is attributed to Adam Smith?
    14·1 answer
  • Social studies need help
    15·2 answers
  • How enslavers "controlled" the enslaved people.​
    7·1 answer
  • What was the most important preparation Ezra made for the journey to Jerusalem (Ezra 7:10)?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!