Answer:
Cairo
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest also sorry for late reply
Answer:
Explanation:
They recognize members who wish to speak, they rule on questions relating to parliamentary procedures as well as appointing members to temporary committees.
Answer:
2. Judiciary act of 1789
3. Washington's Precedents
4. First Cabinet
5. Judiciary act of 1789
6. Washington's Precedents
Based on research studies, it has been observed that while recent protests and revolutions, such as the Arab spring and Ukrainian revolutions, were fueled by grievances that ignited traditional social movements, these modern movements were facilitated by "<u>the rise of the Internet and popular use of various social media websites."</u>
<h3>What is Protest?</h3>
<u>Protest</u> is a term that describes an objection to what someone or a group of people has said or done.
Sociological analysis showed that in traditional social movements were stimulated by "the rise of the Internet and popular use of various social media websites."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the internet and social media can increase the potency of protest.
Learn more about Social media influence here: brainly.com/question/10446253
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
