Alright, imma help you. Imma work on it on a piece of paper. :D
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to divide the TOTAL underweight which is 130, into the total of individuals which is 1000. 130/1000= 0.13 or 13.0%
Answer C.
I just took this quiz today
120/6=20 20*10=200
The answer is 200
Find area of room
aera=legnth wtimes width
in a square, legnth=width
aera=legnth^2
legnth=14 feet
convert o inches
14*12=168 inches
area=168^2=28224 square inches
how many tiles will cover all of floor?
aka
how many 192 in^2 is at least 28224 (at least, because we need to cover the whole floor without gaps)
192x<u>></u>28224
divide both sides by 192
x<u>></u>147
147 is the number of tiles we need
<em>Answer:</em>
Complete proof is written below.
Facts and explanation about the segments shown in question :
- As BC = EF is a given statement in the question
- AB + BC = AC because the definition of betweenness gives us a clear idea that if a point B is between points A and C, then the length of AB and the length of BC is equal to the length of AC. Also according to Segment addition postulate, AB + BC = AC. For example, if AB = 5 and BC= 7 then AC = AB + BC → AC = 12
- AC > BC because the Parts Theorem (Segments) mentions that if B is a point on AC between A and C, then AC > BC and AC>AB. So, if we observe the question figure, we can realize that point B lies on the segment AC between points A and C.
- AC > EF because BC is equal to EF and if AC>BC, then it must be true that the length of AC must greater than the length segment EF.
Below is the complete proof of the observation given in the question:
<em />
<em>STATEMENT REASON </em>
___________________________________________________
1. BC = EF 1. Given
2. AB + BC = AC 2. Betweenness
3. AC > BC 3. Def. of segment inequality
4. AC > EF 4. Def. of congruent segments
<em />
<em>Keywords: statement, length, reason, proof</em>
<em>
Learn more about proof from brainly.com/question/13005321</em>
<em>
#learnwithBrainly</em>