Carnegie proposed that the best way of dealing with the new phenomenon of wealth inequality was for the wealthy to redistribute their surplus means in a responsible and thoughtful manner. This approach was contrasted with traditional bequest (patrimony), where wealth is handed down to heirs, and other forms of bequest where wealth is willed to the state for public purposes. Carnegie argued that surplus wealth is put to best use (produces the greatest net benefit to society) when it is administered carefully by the wealthy. Carnegie also argues against wasteful use of capital in the form of extravagance, irresponsible spending, or self-indulgence, instead promoting the administration of said capital over the course of one's lifetime toward the cause of reducing the stratification between the rich and poor. As a result, the wealthy should administer their riches responsibly and not in a way that encourages "the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy".
Answer:
C separation of powers.
Explanation:
Federalism is where the power for state and the federal government is divided. Separation of powers is the division of state and government powers in order to limit one side from the concentration of power. Checks and balances is where the state and government has regulations and certain powers specific to it's branch to prevent complete dominance. Judicial review is the supreme court declaring a legislation constitutional v. unconstitutional.
Well during world war 2 (the time of the holocaust), these areas were known as "ghettos"
Answer:
i would be able to answer that if i actually knoew what the "following"s are
Explanation:
