Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
Answer:
<u>e) accounts receivable</u>
Explanation:
a) <em>allowance for doubtful accounts:</em> this is used to determinate a provision of uncollectible account. Customers that will not honor their debts.
b)<em>prepaid expenses:</em> This is use for the payment in advance for utilities and other expenses like rent. The description does not involve any payment from Dr Torres.
c)<em>unearned revenues: </em>used when the customer pays the service or goods but the business didn't perform or deliver. The Dr has perform his services so they revenues are earned.
d) <em>intangible assets: </em>refers to trademarks, patents and other assets which related to the business. the customers account are tangible, they are a know value
e) <u>accounts receivable: correct.</u>
This represent the collectible amount from customers, which is exactly what it is happening. The Dr gives a certain amount of time to receive the payment for his services. While the services aren't paid, the Dr has "Accounts to receive"
You can get jobs such as social media manager, accountant, advertising manager, marketing analyst, marketing manager, financial planner, budget planner
Answer:
a)
Explanation:
Mutual funds are investment companies called AMC( asset management companies ) that gather funds from public by issuing units. These funds are then invested in financial securities and financial instruments likes bonds and shares. Mutual funds are managed by financial experts and are less risky for common public than direct investment in stock market.
Answer:
utmost good faith
Explanation:
The utmost good faith refers to the principle in which both the parties are acted honestly i.e it disclosed all the information related to the insurance and does not misguide anything to gain a benefit in term of profit
Therefore in the given case, there is a contract made between the two parties where they trust each other and hope that they treated each one in a honest manner
So this situation represent the utmost good faith
