Answer:
Ending WIP= $13,500
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the factory overhead:</u>
Factory overhead= 25,000*0.75= $18,750
<u>Now, the ending WIP inventory:</u>
cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
68,250 = 11,000 + 27,000 + 25,000 + 18,750 - Ending WIP
Ending WIP= $13,500
Answer:
(a) Issued $50,000 par value common stock for cash = Financing Activities
b) Purchased a machine for $30,000, giving a long-term note in exchange. Financing Activities = Non-cash Investing and Financing Activity
(c) Issued $200,000 par value common stock upon conversion of bonds having a face value of $200,000 = Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
(d) Declared and paid a cash dividend of $18,000 = Financing Activities
(e) Sold a long-term investment with a cost of $15,000 for $15,000 cash = Investing Activities
(f) Collected $16,000 from sale of goods = Operating Activities
Explanation:
The Cash flows related to raising of capital is known as Cash flow from Financing Activities.
The Cash flows related to growing and selling of Assets of the business is known as Cash flow from Investing Activities.
The Cash flow related to trade in Ordinary course business of the Company is known as Cash flow from Operating Activities.
The statement which states that a management contract is an arrangement in which one firm contracts with another to <em>produce products</em> to its specifications is false
According to the given question, we are asked to show whether a management contract is one where there is an arrangement between two firms to <em>produce its goods </em>to its specifications.
As a result of this, we can see that a management contract is one where one firm gives its management skills <em>in part or in full</em> to another firm.
With this in mind, we can see that contract manufacturing is one where there is an arrangement in which one firm contracts with another to <em>produce products</em> to its specifications but is in charge of the marketing.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/17440307
Answer:
Non-compete clause
Explanation:
Non-compete clause is a clause under which one party (usually an employee) accepts not to go into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer). Some courts call these "restrictive covenants".
Answer:
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Sales revenue after crushing 55
Sales revenue at the split-off point <u>81</u>
Additional sales revenue 26
Further processing cost <u> (35)</u>
Net income after further processing <u> (9)
</u>
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
<em>Kindly note that the allocated joint costs( cost of sugar and crushing) are irrelevant. This implies that whether or not the intermediate products are processed further the joint costs are irrelevant to the decision to process the beet juice further</em>.
