None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
The tendency of these people, wherein 10 of them are psychology majors and all of them believing that they will become psychologists, to make predictions about one's life so self-assuredly is called overconfidence.
Being overconfident may have its own pros and cons depending on the situation this behavior used in.
Answer:
Labeling theory posits that self-identity and the behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by the terms used to describe or classify them.
The correct answer is A. a primary group.
Primary group refers to individuals following other people's example when doing something. Here, Mary started using the language of that particular group and dressing like them. Thus, they represent her primary group in her life.
This is probably because scientific journals get cross-referenced and peer-reviewed by other mainstream scientific organizations whereas a regular webpage can tell you just about anything without anything to back it up. Their credibility isn't as high.
