The major effects of the fall of Rome on both Eastern and Western Europe were different because only Western Europe was mainly affected by the fall. However, Eastern Europe didn't experience relevant changes since they were protected by the Byzantines.
<u>These were the main changes in Europe:</u>
Western Europe
The main problem was the loss of economic as well as technological progress because there weren't any Roman armies and tax collectors. Moreover, they began being more influenced by Germanic confederations and stopped having a strong influence of the Mediterranean (even though Christianity brought by the Roman empire was still very strong).
Eastern Europe
They didn't have many differences because there was a big part of the Roman Empire that was still under the Byzantine Empire. Consequently, they lived well and had important trade routes and connections to the outside world.
P_1/T_1 = P_2/T_2
So
P_2 = P_1(T_1/T_2)=(5atm)(108.1/254.5)=2.12atm
"2. Are you writing naturally and academically?" would be the best option. The rest of the answers seem more like revisions to grammatical errors rather than the voice of the essay.
The seneb's were more rich and had more wealth as compared to the Kawit and therefore they had a more luxurious lifestyle.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the old times in the kingdom of Egypt, the people belonging to the tribe of Seneb's were people who had more wealth, more assets and were rich as compared to the people belonging to the tribe of Kawit.
The people of Seneb were owners of a large number of cattle and this helped them to accumulate wealth and because of this they had more luxurious lifestyle. But the people of Kawit were not so rich and therefore did not have such a luxurious lifestyle.
