Answer:
Agriculture helped in achieving a better standard of living.
Explanation:
Jared Diamond argues that crowding led to spread of diseases and infections among people. However, when agriculture was first discovered and established, societies and villages started to shift towards a better standard of living. Societies and villages gradually became the centre of all man-made achievements.
From medicines to security, societies started developing various ways of life that helped in preventing sicknesses and diseases, predators, disharmony, etc. Though there were higher chances of spread of diseases, development of medicines and preventive measures quickly responded in societies.
<span>Your answer would be
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</span>
Hope This Helps!
=D
HR2520, It is a law that deals with the equality and responsibility of 2017 in the internet browsing.
This law seeks to restric the disclosure or access to information of users depending on the sensitivity of the information.
You must also have the express approval of the user for use confidential information, such as social security numbers, financial information and others.
Answer:
Although thousands of protesters simply tried to escape, others fought back, stoning the attacking troops and setting fire to military vehicles. Reporters and Western diplomats there that day estimated that hundreds to thousands of protesters were killed in the Tiananmen Square Massacre, and as many as 10,000 were arrested.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C) Rome, because Roman law forces the accuser to have a burden of proof.
Based on what happens to Citizen X, he lives under the government of Rome.
When we are talking about the term Burden of Proof it means the accuser has to prove his claims. So, in simpler terms, it’s the obligation of the accuser to present the elements that support his claim. In the case of the example, Citizen X lives in Rome because he has to present the proofs that his co-worker stole the watch. There were no proofs, then, the co-worker was found not-guilty in the absence of proofs.
