Since they viewed it as a great way to 'decrease the surplus population', having a different, more sympathetic outlook would have helped. Giving them food they could cook and eat would also have helped: the Irish had a lot of trouble trying to prepare and eat the Indian meal they sent. They could also have opened more soup kitchens, told the landlords to show a little leniency and stop evicting people because heir livelihoods were gone and their means of paying rent with them. But they wanted to get rid of the Irish, and so they did. There was a famine in the Scottish Highlands in 1846 and because of charitable efforts nowhere near as many people died. They could have saved them by showing charity, but they didn't.
Answer:
The correct answer is devil's advocacy.
Explanation:
Devil's advocacy refers to a decision-making technique which used for the purpose of combating groupthink (making decisions as a group) One or more people from the group take up the role of devil's advocate and go on to pinpoint flaws and risks in the subject under consideration. As discussed in the question, it is used to defend unpopular or opposing alternatives for the sake of debate.
50 states are in the united states.
Answer:
C. It enacted the idea of nullification and declared the law null and void
Explanation:
The tariff of abominations, effectively increase the import tax for foreign products. This legislation affected a lot of states in the south which at that time imported large portion of their raw materials from Great Britain and France.
In response to this, Several southern states outright refused to follow the federal legislations regarding this tariff.
They argued that the Tariff of Abominations was unconstitutional and they refused to implemented within their region. This refusal is what commonly considered as 'Declaring the law null and void'
Answer:
king henry ll in the 12th century
