12th, 20th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th all deal with the presidency and presidential elections.
The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
- For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.
This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims.
Answer:
The definition of an offer is an act of putting something forth for consideration, acceptance or rejection or something suggested or proposed. An example of offer is the act of putting in a bid on a house. An example of offer is the suggested sum of $30 per hour for tutoring.
Explanation:
Pabrainliestpo
Brainliest me
