The people and their interactions in the text includes how people wanted to squash their cultural identity but still had differences crammed in their backpacks.
<h3>What is the interaction between people and ideas in the text?</h3>
It follows from textual evidence that;
- As much as I tried to squash my cultural identity, my peers were curious, often asking questions revolved around the practical — “Why are you vegetarian?” or “What’s a sari?” — to the more personal — “You go to a temple?
On this note, it follows from the text that people initially had cultural differences even though they want to squash their cultural differences.
Read more on textual evidence;
brainly.com/question/25658352
#SPJ1
A. IS INCORECT because it needs to be changed to AFFECT.
B. IS INCORECT because it also needs to be AFFECT.
<u>C. IS CORRECT</u> because it properly uses EFFECT in a scentence.
D. IS INCORECT because it needs to be changed to AFFECT.
Most of the time, you'll want affect as a verb meaning to influence something and effect for the something that was influenced. The difference between affect and effect is so slippery that people have started using "impact" as a verb instead. Don't be one of them! -coppied from google if you choose to use this please dont copy it word for word! thanks
Answer:
Answer C
Explanation:
Correct. The author uses the two commas to separate three comments, introduced by “But you will tell me,” that his audience could make to counter his earlier argument about nineteenth-century artists’ relationship to their surroundings. By using commas this way, the author is able to quickly identify and distinguish among three related claims within a potential counterargument to his own views. Doing so allows him to begin refuting this counterargument in the next paragraph.
Answer:
I like the 3rd one best with the girl with pink for the background