Answer:
Full funding policy.
Explanation:
This would be a violation of Full funding policy.
Full funding strategy is a federal budgeting requirement implemented by Congress in the 1950s on the Department of Defense (DOD) that mandates all acquisition expenses of a weapons or piece of military equipment to be financed in the year the object is procured. Hence in the above example there is violation of Full funding strategy.
Answer:
$38,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the City General Fund balance sheet for the month of December 31, 2019 shows that inventory had the amount of $28,000 while prepaid rent has the amount of $10,000 which means that the amount of money that city will report as NOSPENDABLE fund balance in their general fund on December 31,2019 will be $38,000 calculated as ($28,000+$10,000).
<span>A public in-state college charges less for in-state tuition than for out-of-state tuition.
</span>Tara will most likely have to pay room and board expenses at an out-of-state public college, but might be able to commute to a public college in state.
Answer:
a. There are two separate performance obligations in the contract. Gym membership is one performance obligation and the providing 25% discount on yoga classes is another performance obligation.
b. The standalone selling price of annual membership is $720. Therefore, F&S will allocate
of 700 contract price to the discount voucher on yoga course and the remaining $672 will be allocated to membership.
C. solution is in the image attached.
Explanation:
b. F&S offers a 10% discount on yoga classes to all customers as part of promotional strategy. Therefore a 25% discount voucher provides a customer with an incremental value of 15% (25%-10%). Thus, the estimated stand alone selling price of the discount voucher provided by F&S is $30 ($500 * 15% incremental discount * 40% likelihood of the vouchers being redeemed).
They will fall too. Hope this helps