You need to list the following or else nobody can answer.
A longitudinal study that followed 1200 older adults in their transition from independent living to age-restricted housing in 1995 found that those older adults who transitioned to more expensive communities fared THE BEST with regard to physical health and overall life satisfaction and those who transitioned to government subsidized housing programs fared THE WORSE.
Explanation:
More expensive age restricted communities offer services that can enhance quality of life for the elderly. They are cared for by professionals, their every needs are met, they can have a thriving social life, they are protected, they are independent and they can enjoy their lives while being in a safe environment. Therefore they fare the best.
Government subsidized housing programs for the elderly do not offer anywhere near the quality of care and services as the expensive ones. There is little money and resources put into these programs and the level of care is far less making the quality of life for the residents poorer. Therefore they fare the worse.
Answer:
Satisficing
Explanation:
It is a decision making strategy which aimed to purposed a satisfactorily result. Satisficing concentrate on realistic efforts when encountering the task. This strategy aims to focus on the optimal level of solutions. The theory of satisficing was found to be applied in field economics, artificial intelligence, and sociology. Satisficing is a strategy adopted by an organization that seeks to meet the minimal level of expectancies for credits. This contradiction put to maximize the profit by combined attempts that put the organization high demands on the performance crosswise sales, marketing, and other departments.
<span>The constitutions of the states were somewhat different. Though they all created constitutions that reflected their local beliefs and needs, they also largely kept colonial traditions. For example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 removed property requirements for voting and holding office, while South Carolina's increased the amount of land a white man had to own in order to vote. However, the states generally all lowered the power of their governors and increased the power of their assemblies.</span>
