The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D) A modifier makes a word more interesting or specific
The predicate nominative "renames" the subject.
The subject of the sentence is "Algeria" , so we're looking for another way of referring to Algeria here. This is "country" so the correct answer is A.
The two verbs in that sentence is ran and tired <span />
Dr. King refers to peaceful protest when referencing the "majestic heights". He describes peaceful protest as meeting physical force with soul force, or the will to see that justice is enacted through nonviolent means. This is truly a difficult thing to accomplish in the face of brutal injustice, and is a majestic height to reach indeed. Dr. King proved that such heights could be reached, and that real progress toward equality could be made by nonviolent means.
