Answer: Scientific revolution is a result of the spirit/psychology of renaissance but in contrast to renaissance scientific revolution took place almost exclusively in the northern Europe. Before scientific revolution European society and culture is still full of religious symbolism and faith in God but all that mixtured with spirit of renaissance (some very inventive spirits helped to revolutionize the world).
Explanation: In a renaissance there are still no scientific institutions, there is no unified paradigm. Renaissance is very creative period because there are many paradigms coexisting in a very small space. There is a great impact of Judaism and Arabian philosophy. Marsilio Ficino and Pico della Mirandola have big interest in Egypt and Hermes Trismegistos, there are new translations of some Plato´s dialogues etc etc. There is a lot of spirit in the air and not everything takes form (doctrine, dogma). Scientific revolutions is a movement in direction to institutionalized science and definition of science (Enlightenment).
They were influenced by other nations, like Dutch. They came from a wide variety of backgrounds. ... It had a good Atlantic harbor and it divided New England from the Southern colonies.
Answer:
Here are some examples from my school's artists:
Explanation:
Answer:
Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states and the people. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, but they never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, and so had to fight the ratification at every state convention. So basically the federalists wanted a strong central govt and a weak state govt. The anti ferderalists wanted power in the states and not the central govt
Explanation: