Answer:
<h2>Hey option A is correct......</h2>
This conclusion is not valid because BOTH SOIL BRANDS WERE NOT SUBJECTED TO THE SAME CONDITIONS.
Carlisle applied brand A to the part of the yard that received full sunlight while brand B was applied to the area of the yard which received partial sunlight. This implies that the soils were subjected to different conditions and this ought not to be so, since sunlight is a very important factor, which the soils need.
25+ 45= 70
70% of 180 is 126
170-126=54
Hope that’s right! I don’t know if that’s the appropriate way to do it, but that’s how I would do it.
You have the correct answer being (-5,3). Simply add the parentheses around the point
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Gabrielle and John each
wrote the prime factorization of 64.
64 can be break into 32 times 2
32 can be break into 16 times 2
16 can be break into 8 and 2
8 can be break into 4 times 2
4 can be break into 2 times 2
So 64 is equal to 2 times 2 times 2 times 2 times 2 times 2
