Each culpable party is responsible for its proportionate share of the damages. Damages are always the responsibility of all negligent parties.
What is joint and several liability?
- Each party is individually liable for the entire extent of the damages caused by the tortious act when two or more people become jointly and severally responsible for that though.
- As a result, if a plaintiff obtains a monetary judgment against all of the parties, they may each be held liable for the full amount of the verdict.
- The other wrongdoers may then be asked to contribute to that party. The law of undivided injury is the name given to the idea of picking the defendant(s) against whom to seek damages.
The worrisome consequences are as previously mentioned, joint and several liability usually works in the plaintiff's favor because it raises the likelihood that every one of the damages granted will be recouped.
In contrast hand, it can be thought unjust for a party to suffer a disproportionate financial loss as a result of an unpleasant incident for which it had only a tiny responsibility.
Learn more about joint and several liability here:
brainly.com/question/24182454
#SPJ4
Answer:
$3,960
Explanation:
The Borrowed amount is $198,000 on November 1, 2021.
The interest expense at December 31, 2021 is calculated as shown below:
I=PRT
R=12%=0.12
P=$198,000
T=2 Months=(2/12) year
I=198,000*0.12*(2/12)
I=$3960
The correct option will be "B. $3,960."
Answer:
exclusive dealing
Explanation:
Exclusive dealing -
It is the method , where a deal is set up between a specific supplier and the wholesaler or the retailer , where the no other distributor would be able to receive the supply , is referred to as exclusive dealing.
In this scenario no other dealer can not handle the product in any case.
Hence , from the scenario of the question,
The correct option is exclusive dealing .
Answer:
Free trade.
Explanation:
This theoretical policy can be explained to be certain laws under which the government is seen to impose absolutely no tariffs, taxes, or duties on imports, or quotas on exports. Therefore, it is directly seen to be the opposite of protectionism, a defensive trade policy intended to eliminate the possibility of foreign competition. It is seen in terms of unrestricted measures in importation and also exportation of goods in and out of a country.
In the world of our own, which is of the recent times, this policy implementation is done by means of a formal and mutual agreement of the nations which are seen to be involved. Also this policy in some cases may simply be the absence of any trade restrictions.
