Answer:
No, her ratio is greater than 37%
Explanation:
Given:
Monthly income = $3,300
Credit card expenses = $80
Student loan expenses = $130
Car payment = $215
All insurances = $1,221
Computation:
Total debt to income ratio = Total debt / Total income
Total debt to income ratio = (80 + 130 + 215 + 1221) / 3300
Total debt to income ratio = 49.87%
Housing payments to income ratio = All insurances / Monthly income
Housing payments to income ratio = (1221) / 3300
Housing payments to income ratio = 37%
No, her ratio is greater than 37%
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
Answer:
c. credit to notes payable
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the Equipment which cost the amount of $16000 was purchased by paying the amount of $4000 as cash which means that if the company sign a NOTE PAYABLE for the remainder. The journal entry should include a: CREDIT TO NOTES PAYABLE
Traditional career development programs of the past focused on helping an employee advance <span>by holding a series of jobs in a single organization.</span>
