8x - 2y = 48, y =4
8x - 2(4) = 48
8x - 8 = 48
8x = 48+8
8x = 56
x = 56/8 = 7
x = 7
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
This explanation mostly depends on what you're learning right now. The first way would be to convert this matrix to a system of equations like this.
g + t + k = 90
g + 2t - k = 55
-g - t + 3k = 30
Then you solve using normal methods of substitution or elimination. It seems to me that elimination is the quickest method.
g + t + k = 90
-g - t + 3k = 30
____________
0 + 0 + 4k = 120
4k = 120
k = 30
No you can plug this into the first two equations
g + t + (30) = 90
g + t = 60
and
g + 2t - (30) = 55
g + 2t = 85
now use elimination again by multiplying the first equation by -1
g + 2t = 85
-g - t = -60
_________
0 + t = 25
t = 25
Now plug those both back into one of the equations. I'll just do the first one.
g + (25) + (30) = 90
g = 35
Therefore, we know that Ted spent the least amount of time on the computer.
The second method is using matrix reduction and getting the matrix in the row echelon form, therefore solving using the gauss jordan method. If you would like me to go through this instead, please leave a comment.
1225.
It is also called 35 squared. It is 35X35
The power is how many times you multiply the number by itself.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Population Mean = 7.1
sample size = 24
Sample mean = 7.3
Standard deviation = 1.0
Level of significance = 0.025
The null hypothesis:
The alternative hypothesis:
This test is right-tailed.
Rejection region: at ∝ = 0.025 and df of 23, the critical value of the right-tailed test 
The test statistics can be computed as:
t = 0.980
Decision rule:
Since the calculated value of t is lesser than, i.e t = 0.980 < , then we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to claim that the population mean is greater than 7.1 at 0.025 level of significance.
