The case was important to understanding the changing nature of American Federalism because it said the constitution implicitly as well as explicitly grants some power to congress through the "necessary and proper clause"
hope this helps
Answer:
the huge commercial and financial impact of the Games as a result of television and corporate sponsorship
Explanation:
Due to participation of other countries in the Olympic Games, the concept of the game changes from ordinary sport to an opportunity to showcase business brands, advertisement, and corporate sponsorship.
Hence, in order to incorporate all aspect of the finance and business related of the Olympic Games, the competition are being held every 4 years, with the Summer and Winter Games substituting by happening at regular intervals however two years separated.
Therefore, it can be concluded that, Olympic Games moved away from the traditional nationalistic model because of the huge commercial and financial impact of the Games as a result of television and corporate sponsorship.
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
