<span>Judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of law</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
When John meets with an old man he reacts sympathetically. He considers and imagined the circumstances that pulled an old man into poverty and unemployment and wonders why so many people were unemployed in the society. Then he imagined that the old man lost his home and job due to social changes. social change impacts can be negative and positive. Some people adapted the changes and grow up easily but some people like an old man lost their home and bread and bitter earning and leads to living a life without home and earnings. He visualizes all the situation related to the old man.
I think that a territory could become a state when it reaches a population of 150,000.
This is an example of<span> "appetite".</span>
<span>Appetite refers to the desire or want to eat food, some of the time because of hunger. Engaging nourishments can empower craving notwithstanding when hunger is missing, in spite of the fact that craving can be significantly lessened by satiety. Appetite exists in all higher living things, and serves to manage sufficient vitality admission to keep up metabolic requirements. </span>
The correct answer is C.
The Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark case from the US Supreme Court, issued in 1896.
It confirmed that segregated facilities were not violating the US constitution as long as the ones for whites and the ones for black citizens were equal in quality. From this decision, the principle "separate but equal" was derived.
It actually gave legitimacy to the Jim Crow laws that many Southern States were enacting, and which promoted segregation and indirect discriminations.
