Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
Answer:
Hope this helps at all! :D
Explanation:
meso-region (Noun) A administrative system that is equivalent to a prefecture or a department. It is used in Brazil as a third-level administration between state and micro-region. Editors Contribution (0.00 / 0 votes)Rate this definition:
Answer: This statement could be both true and false because other factors come into play when several people with these characteristics are questioned.
Explanation:
Happiness is something relative since for each thing happiness represents something different. For many, happiness has to do with reaching the highest position in their workplace, for others, it is having a child and for others, it is simply having health. In the case of the statement expressed above, in some cases, the happiest people are those who have gone to college and have more money which is because many times happiness is associated with the amount of money a person makes. When a person has a good amount of money, he can buy the things he likes, help his family and cover expenses in case of an eventuality, which provides security and the person can feel better what in other cases translates to happiness. But there are also people who, although they have not reached a high educational level, have a fixed income of money and other elements, can also represent happiness.
The poorest communities may indeed in many cases not feel happy because they do not have money to buy something that is needed in the house such as food or a comfortable bed to sleep in, this causes discomfort and cannot be translated as happiness. Since happiness is relative, one cannot simply deduce that because a person has a good education and earns a lot of money, he will be happy, but compared to another with low resources to a certain degree, since happiness would be related to meeting present needs.
Should pay attention in class
