Answer:
both supported limiting the number of new arrivals, and argued that the growing immigration population had created social problems
Explanation:
Progressive reformers were known for their movement to end corruption,improve welfare and protection of citizens as well as increase government intervention I'm making this possible. It originated from the need to work on issues that had freshly arisen at the time such as industrialization, urbanization and immigration and corruption.
The progressive era(1890s to 1920s)in America was a time of negative views on immigration. Progressive movement for Americams during this period consisted nativism with the belief that a benevolent immigramt policy was bad for the country.
<u>The consequences of life tenure for federal judges:</u>
- Life tenure for federal judges was implemented for an extraordinarily vital purpose.
- It protects the judges from the 'political stress' which might come with periodic liability to an 'electorate'.
- But importantly, this ideal does not demand life tenure. Appointment without possibility of renewal for a fixed term of years would fulfill the same purpose.
- But ironically this life tenure has further magnified political divisions.
- So, this has failed to completely implement the judicial independence that the lifetime appointment of a federal judge had hoped to serve.
Answer: Common
Explanation: Common law system is established on tradition, custom and precedence as they are unwritten and judicial decision on cases are determined by the outcome of the decision or verdict given on previous cases of similar stature or condition. Common laws digs into the past to reference previous cases and the country's legal history and also applying custom and tradition to specific circumstances. Judges opinion are backed by rulings passed on prior happenings or circumstances as the judges are empowered to modify judicial ruling.
