Answer:
The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution.
The answer is a desirable outcome. In an approach-approach, the individual is faced with the necessity of making a choice between two (or more) desirable goals. Since both goals are desirable, this is the least worrying situation. "Shall I fly or take a boat to Europe?" might be easily determined if both means of travel are seen as pleasurable. Such situations produce a state of unstable equilibrium. As soon as one goal is approached, its desirability increases and completely dominates, thereby making the choice easy. The choice becomes easier the closer one moves toward either goal. Another example is when a person pick between two attractive and practicable careers, may lead to some indecisiveness but rarely to great distress. A person chooses the most convenient goal that results to a desirable outcome.
Pluralism is the theory that all interests are and should be free to compete for influence in the government and the outcome of this competition is compromise and moderation.
Pluralism is the view that politics and decision-making are principally within the framework of state, however that a lot of non-governmental groups use their resources to exert their impact. The central question for classical pluralism is how power and influence are distributed during a political process.
India is an example of a pluralistic society as here are so many religious communities and they do not blend but are identified as separate entities which are concerning with their own interests, values and beliefs.
To learn more about Government here
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
<span>The constitutions of the states were somewhat different. Though they all created constitutions that reflected their local beliefs and needs, they also largely kept colonial traditions. For example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 removed property requirements for voting and holding office, while South Carolina's increased the amount of land a white man had to own in order to vote. However, the states generally all lowered the power of their governors and increased the power of their assemblies.</span>
