Answer:
2. Her name was Michelle.
3. The man was wearing a checked shirt tucked into his brown trousers.
4. He was carrying briefcase.
5. The girl was looking for her head gear inside her bag.
6. She brought out the head gear out of her bag and wore it.
7. The man started talking to the girl.
8. The girl stood up and walked away because she was not comfortable talking with stranger.
9. The man felt embarrassed and humiliated ; so he quietly left the place.
Explanation:
I have written complete sentences in my story. My story is unique because it carries exposition, rising action, climax, falling action and resolution.
1. B --> mussels, oysters, clams, shrimp, carp and catfish is a list (series) of foods that has to be separated by a comma
2. B--> if you remove 'confine them to a pond or cage' its a normal sentence, so i think its b
Answer:
The conversation between Mr. Spring Fragrance and Young Man, allows for reflection on love, loss and happiness. This creates a sentimental framework for Mr. Spring Frangance that allows his development and relevance to history.
Explanation:
Mr. Spring Fragrance and Young Man talk about the importance of loving, at least once in their lives. Mr. Spring Fragrance had heard his wife say that it is better to love and not have what you love than never to have loved, he does not understand this concept and when asking Young Man gets to explain that it is important to love, even if it is never possible having what you love, love, in this case, is more important and rewarding than luck.
Mr. Spring Fragrance does not like this meaning and is unhappy that people support this type of concept. However, this causes a strong reflection on him, allows him to understand his wife and develops him, making him believe and be essential to the plot.
Of the opening sentences that were presented here that strongly engages the reader and provides context to them would be the second one which is "We could have had a worse weekend, but it's awfully hard to beat Bigfoot and bugs."
The first and third one were just not good enough because it exposes the rest of the context to the reader and lets them have the idea of what you are talking about which usually leads to the readers not choosing to continue to read, thus taking out the reader's engagement but still provides context. The last one is better than the first and third, but it spilled the beans when it mentioned the particulars as to what made the weekend bad to worse. The answer is just right. It has the impact that would hook the reader to know more about your weekend and why is Bigfoot and bugs together in your statement. The rain wasn't mentioned which would be ideal to make the story telling take a turn to much worse which would spike up the interest of the reader.
