The balance that can be used to measure a mass reading of 6.521 g will be a balance with ±0.001 g tolerance.
<h3>What is the tolerance of a balance?</h3>
The tolerance of a balance is the number of decimal place values displayed on the balance and it is the acceptable measurement limitations (in grams) that a balance can tolerate.
- As such, depending on the decimal place value behind a mass reading will determine the balance used for measurement.
Since no mass reading was given, let's make two assumptions about mass reading.
Mass reading Assumptions
1 6.521 g
2 4.23 g
- The balance used for the 6.521 g mass reading is a balance with ±0.001 g tolerance.
- The balance used for the 4.23 g mass reading is a balance with ±0.01 g tolerance.
Learn more about tolerance of a balance here:
brainly.com/question/4804631
Both the cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, involved interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court decided that racial discrimination in accommodations was permissible. After 58 years, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) that racial accommodations were fundamentally unfair and therefore unconstitutional.
The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, which sanctioned the "separate but equal" practises, was overturned by the Brown decision, making it a significant legal precedent. According to the Plessy decision's interpretation of the 14th Amendment, segregated facilities might be used to achieve legal equality.
Know more about Plessy v. Ferguson here
brainly.com/question/12846797
#SPJ4
Answer: the correct answer is B Foot-in-the-door phenomenon
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door (FITD) phenomenon is a compliance tactic that aims at getting a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first.
The principle involved is that a small agreement creates a bond between the requester and the requestee. Even though the requestee may only have agreed to a trivial request out of politeness, this forms a relationship which – when the requestee attempts to justify the decision to themselves – may be mistaken for a real affinity with the requester, or an interest in the subject of the request. When a future request is made, the requestee might feel obliged to act concurrently with the earlier one.
