Answer:
C. She passed laws restricting the ability of non-native Hawaiians to own property or vote in
Hawaiian elections.
Explanation:
Since majority of the sugar plantation owners happened to be non-Hawaiians, they saw it as an avenue where by their investments and property in the plantation could be lost since they are not citizens.
This created panic among them leading to their plotting on overthrowing Queen Liliuokalani.
Answer:
The powerful people won the election.
Explanation:
Tactics such as donating money to political campaigns may be considered a drawback because due to this money the powerful people won the election instead of competent people which cost the country a lot. If there is no money used for political campaigns so the more competent person won the election that leads to increase in the prosperity and development of the country and its people.
The scholars know that the Indo-Aryans was once raised cattle and depended upon their milk but later turned to agriculture for they found evidence in the Vendidad where it shows the importance of sheep and cattle-rearing and their agricultural activities was considerably developed. These have been proved from careful comparison of a number of Vedic and Avesta words relating to agriculture.
Moreover, in most Vedic hymns, one can draw a conclusion that they settled down to a peaceful agricultural life and in the book of Atharva Veda, it contains the tradition of agriculture and that Prthi-Vainya was the inventor of ploughing.
Historians look for causes and effects that help to explain how and why events happened.
Answer:
your question is not understanding sry
