Answer:
1. Jews ⇒ d. Matthew
The Gospel according to Matthew is the first book of the New Testament in the Bible and seems to have been written for a Jewish audience. This is why the book included prophecies and stories from the Old Testament which Jews would be expected to know.
2. Greeks ⇒ a. Luke
The Gospel according to Luke is said to be intellectual in nature. It showed Jesus to be a divine being who was perfect in his ways and spoke with brilliance and eloquence. This is what the Greeks liked at the time and so it is said that this Gospel was aimed at them.
3. Romans ⇒ c. Mark
The Gospel according to Mark tried to explain the Jewish customs and the miracles performed by Jesus. This means that it was not written for those who already knew the ways of the Jews and considering that Israel was under Roman occupation at the time, it was most probably for Roman subjects.
4. All men ⇒ b. John
The Gospel according to John was written as a first-hand account by somebody who was with Jesus and loved him dearly. He wanted people to see that Jesus cared about everyone whether Jew or Gentile which means therefore, that he wrote for all men.
Hello. You did not show the cartoon to which the question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately, but I will help you in the best possible way.
When an artist does a political cartoon, he is trying to make the public realize an adverse situation that is happening in politics in a critical and punctual way. Political cartoons generally present political issues in a satirical and ironic way, but they can also expose these issues in a literal and serious way.
Answer:
In this era, the top speeds were about 100 MPH. When the pilots ventured ten miles over the enemy lines, that was a notable event. The pilots carried no parachutes. The airplanes were made of wood and canvas; when they caught on fire, it spread quickly, and spelled certain death for the occupants.
Explanation:
i got this form http://acepilots.com/wwi/main.html#:~:text=In%20this%20era%2C%20the%20top,certain%20death%20for%20the%20occupants.
Answer:
1. The Federalist believed that there is no need for inclusion of Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that Constitution restricted the government not the individuals or citizens.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people
Explanation:
1. The Federalists believed that there is no need for inclusion of the Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that the Constitution restricted the government, not the individuals or citizens. - The Federalists which was spearheaded by the likes of Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, wrote various documents termed as "Federalist papers" (sometimes referred to as Publius) where they argued their case against the Bill of Rights. Their conclusion was that the Bill of Rights would only impede the rights of the people rather than safeguard them.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of the Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people - These group of people argued their case in various papers termed as Brutus, Centinel etc. One of the major personality in this camp is Patrick Henry.
Their submissions amongst others, were that the new constitution can turn the central government to be a threat to their individual liberties.
The Bill of Rights limited royal power, and the document itself listed many things a ruler couldn’t do. The Bill of Rights was drafted in 1689 by parliament, and it basically separated the laws
