Marginal productivity theory assumes that a worker’s income is a function of the contribution of that worker to the value of the output. in business, this is called the "value-added" approach.
There is a correct theory called marginal productivity theory. Wages are paid at a level equal to the marginal revenue product of labor, the MRP (value of the marginal product of labor). MRP is the increase in income caused by the increase in output produced by the last employed worker.
The marginal productivity theory of income distribution proposes that each individual should receive income based on their contribution to total output. The marginal productivity theory of income distribution has been criticized for the following reasons. Income from inheritance is inconsistent with the theory.
Learn more about Marginal revenue here: brainly.com/question/13617399
#SPJ4
Introduction
“Project risk analysis,” as described by The Project Management Institute (PMI®), “includes the processes concerned with conducting risk management, planning, identification analysis, response, and monitoring and control on a project;./…” (PMI, 2004, p 237) These processes include risk identification and quantification, risk response development and risk response control.
Because these processes interact with each other as well as with processes in other parts of an organization, companies are beginning to measure risk across all of their projects as part of an enterprise portfolio.
Risk management can be as simple as identifying a list of technological, operational and business risks, or as comprehensive as in-depth schedule risk analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. But because risk is a driver in an organization's growth – the greater the risk, the greater the reward – the adoption of a structured enterprisewide project risk analysis program will give managers confidence in their decision-making to foster organizational growth and increase ROI for their stakeholders.
Choosing the right projects
How well an organization examines the risks associated with its initiatives, how well it understands the way that projects planned or underway are impacted by risk, and how well it develops mitigation strategies to protect the organization, can mean the difference between a crisis and an opportunity.
Examples abound of companies that have seen their fortunes rise or drop based on the effectiveness of their risk management – a pharmaceutical company makes headlines when its promising new drug brings unforeseen side effects. Or a large telecom corporation pours millions of dollars into perfecting long distance, while new technologies are presenting more exciting opportunities.
Today that pharmaceutical is distracted by lawsuits and financial payouts, finding itself with a shrinking pipeline of new drugs. The telecom, on the other hand, after using a portfolio risk management software application to rationalize and rank its initiatives, made the decision to shift its research dollars away from perfecting long distance and into developing VOIP -- rejuvenating and reinforcing its leadership position.
If the Fed mailed everyone a $1,000, the effect would be a <u>rise in prices, </u>output, and income.
<h3 /><h3>What happens when money is injected into the economy?</h3>
The Equation of exchange is:
<em>Money supply x Velocity of money = Price level x Quantity of goods and services produced </em>
If the Money supply increases like it will when $1,000 is sent by the Fed to people, the velocity will also rise as people purchase more goods and services.
The Price level and the Quantity produced on the right side of the equation would also have to rise to match the left side. So prices would rise, and so would output.
Find out more on the equation of exchange at brainly.com/question/10110078.
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. The transactions would lower Safeco's financial strength as measured by its current ratio but raise Risco's current ratio
Explanation:
The formula to compute the current ratio is shown below:
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
So,
For Safeco, the current ratio would be
= $20 million ÷ $10 million
= 2 times
And for Risco, the current ratio would be
= $10 million ÷ $20 million
= 0.5 times
After borrowing, the current ratio would be
The current assets and the current liabilities would be increased by $10 million in each side.
For Safeco, the current ratio would be
= $30 million ÷ $20 million
= 1.5 times
And for Risco, the current ratio would be
= $20 million ÷ $30 million
= 0.67 times
By comparing the current ratio, we get to know that The Safeco current ratio would be decreased whereas, the Risco current ratio is increased
Hence, option b is correct
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The dinner-dance committee has assembled the following expected costs for the event:
Dinner (per person) $ 18
Favors and program (per person) $ 2
Band $ 2,800
Rental of ballroom $ 900
Professional entertainment during intermission $ 1,000
Tickets and advertising $ 1,300
The committee members would like to charge $35 per person.
1) Break-even point= fixed costs/ contribution margin
Break-evenn point= (Band+rental+professional entertainment+tickets)/[price - (dinner+favors)]
Break-even point= 6000/(35-20)= 400 individuals
2) Q= 300 P=?
300=6000/(P-20)
300*(P-20)= 6000
300P=12000
P=$40
