Answer:
If Holt and Collins retain the right to a Class action.
Explanation:
Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. The Parties involved in the case refer their disputes to an arbitrator who will making a decision after reviewing the evidence and listening to the parties.
Arbitration clauses can be mandatory or voluntary, and the arbitrator's decision may be binding or nonbinding. (binding means you are not going to court again, but would abide by the decisions if the arbitrator).
Furthermore, the Arbitration is a legal technique used by the parties involved in a dispute to resolve the disputes outside the courts, the parties refer the disputes to one or more persons called either the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal", by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound.
Then A "class action" lawsuit or the
"mass tort litigation" is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. It can also be called the "multi-district litigation".
If Holt and Collins decide to retain the right to a Class action, it will definitely not be the result of an arbitration.
Trials in criminal and civil cases are generally conducted the same way. After all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the law related.
Answer:
c. Both of the above are TRUE.
"Overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity. It is an act of justice. It is the protection of a fundamental human right: The right to dignity and to a decent life."
-Nelson Mandela
Nelson Mandala believes that overcoming poverty is giving others a chance to thrive, when originally, they may not have had that door. By opening them, he believes that it is just, not charitable.
Answer:
The service repair company advised Travis of the issues with the steering problems. He disregarded the notice and decided to drive the four wheeler before fixing the issue. Therefore, Travis assumed all responsibility after knowingly driving the four wheeler after being told of its issues. The people who he hit and caused damaged or injury to would clearly have a case against him. Perhaps even if he wasn't aware of the problems and caused damage to their persons or property, he would still be at fault. However, in that situation, he would likely be able to go after the service repair shop showing negligence on their part for failure to disclose this information.
Explanation:
