Advantages
Low crime rates.
In a dictatorship, usually, there are very strict rules and punishment for even a small crime or violation of the law. Such strict punishments arise threat among people. Thus there are lower crimes as compared to the countries which do not have a dictator form of government.
Rapid progression
The dictators have access and control over everything right from the economy to the laws and the people. Hence they do not have to worry about this field. They set their goals in which they have to progress and develop. The absence of other concerns helps them to achieve their goal easily.
Efficient administration
They set the rules and regulations which they think are suitable. No one amongst the citizens dares to object them. Because there is no consultation or debates taking place over any issue, hence quick actions can be taken. This makes a dictator country always stay ahead of rival nations.
We get a stable government.
There’s less space for corruption amongst citizens.
They prove very crucial during the times of emergency. Because there’s only one person taking the decision so there’s no last moment ambiguity in opinions. However in case something goes wrong the person responsible is only blamed.
Disadvantages
It leads to abuse of power. The dictator misuses his power at the expense of the citizens.
Dictators always oppress and suppress the people. Or even promote their own favorites and interests. This causes inequality but no one really objects because it would mean putting oneself in danger at the hands of the ruling government.
Mass killings. Large numbers of innocent people are killed. Because the people might get frustrated with the policies of the government and this makes the dictator consider the person ad enemies of the government.
The population is never happy with such a government. So it’s possible that at some point the masses will protest and agitate against the policies of unity and try to overthrow the government. This dictatorship is not permanent and never sustains for long. It somehow leads to war. At present North Korea is the biggest example of power dictatorship and the country is so advanced with all its technologies and nuclear weapons that despite this being the 21st century even if multiple countries join hands and come along to wage war against it then they will suffer a greater loss and does not even ensures their victory.
그것이 당신에게 도움이되기를 바랍니다
가장 똑똑한 것으로 표시하십시오
좋은 하루 되세요
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
Answer:
necessary to balance proper exercise of the power
Explanation:
The term "Necessary and Proper Clause" was coined by Associate Justice Louis Brandeis in 1926. It is universally adopted by the courts in United States. It is also known as the "Elastic clause".
Necessary and Proper Clause: Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution
"The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof".
The clause gained prominence after Supreme Court's decision in <em>Lambert v. Yellowley </em>case. The court ruled in favor of restricting medicinal use of alcohol under the 18th Amendment. It was deemed necessary to balance proper exercise of the power.
It is a unique clause in American Constitution as it gives no absolute authority to any law rather it can be amended considering the seriousness of the situation. It makes the Constitution more flexible as well as a method to deal cases with immediate concerns.
The first ten amendments of the constitution, si the answer is C
