The answer to this question is all of them
The attorney-client privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers. But, according to the crime-fraud exception to the privilege, a client's communication to her attorney isn't privileged if she made it with the intention of committing or covering up a crime or fraud.
The attorney-client privilege protects from disclosure to third parties: (a) confidential communications; (b) between an attorney and client; (c) made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. Unless all three of these prongs are met, the communication is not privileged.
Answer:
Criminally poor.
Explanation:
In medieval times, the power and ability to exercise rights of each person was directly proportional to their wealth: the greater the wealth, the greater the power that this person had regarding their rights, and their ability to act within (and outside) of the law was expanded. On the contrary, low-income people had fewer possibilities of this type, with which their actions were constantly being evaluated by governments.
In this context, in case of crimes, the penalties were much harsher depending on whether they were rich people or poor people. The latter, if convicted, could be tortured or even sentenced to death; penalties that were not applied to people with greater purchasing power.
A reckless homicide is a crime someone is aware that there act created a significant risk or death to a bodily injured person but ignores the risk and continues to act.
Hopefully that helped
