Explanation:
crops needs Air, water and sunlight in it's environment
Answer:
1. recall of past events or memories ----> reminiscence
2. 2. distinctive groups of art or literature; species or class ----> genre
3. opinions of editor or publisher ----> editorials
4. short, compact, literary composition ----> vignettes
5. the quality which makes something comic, amusing, or ludicrous ----> humor
6. diary or journal with a historical emphasis ----> memoirs
7. factual writing as opposed to imaginative writing ----> nonfiction
8. share and understand the feelings and experiences of others ----> empathy
9. clever writing that pokes fun at a situation ----> satire
10. a direct comparison between two things in one major respect ----> metaphor
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
Answer and Explanation:
B1: We can analyze the relevance of the hypodermic theory in the current world through the news about the elaboration of vaccines against the coronavirus. This is because we can perceive the same global feeling of relief and hope in all countries with news about vaccination showing that studies on hypodermic theory are relevant, since this theory states that a media message has the power to affect a mass population in a relatively similar way.
B2: Promoting equality within a diverse community, allows all citizens to have quick access to quality information. This prevents the population from being deceived or even exploited by the mass of media owners within that society.
I would, for the simple fact of she saved many peoples lives. She impacted so many peoples lives, but in a good way. African Americans were treated so poorly and pushed around like dogs, she helped around 70 of the people treated like this. Those 70 people might've died if she hadn't done that. She inspired other people to make a stand. To talk out against all of this. She didn't have to, but she did. Why? Because she was treated like a dog herself. She was born into slavery and eventually escaped. She must've thought that if she could do it herself, she could help others. Once she felt freedom, how amazing it felt, she had the courage to go back and help other slaves. Even at the risk of being caught, she still did it. After helping the people she did, she must've had an amazing feeling. Even though she didn't have to, she did. It had to have given her a sense of happiness. After saving other people, and giving them the freedom they deserved. This one woman, Harriet Tubman, had an impact, and if she hadn't done what she did, well, who knows. Men always said that women aren't strong enough to do that, she proved them wrong. Well, so did other women but Harriet Tubman, I think was someone who impacted the most.
I would put your own spin on it, and also it 19 lines...
