Answer:
A. the price of the entree
Explanation:
Answer:
egocentric fallacy
Explanation:
Any fallacy is always a reasoning that leads to an erroneous conclusion, for thinking that others will act based on our same set of values or premises- This tendency to rely heavily on our perspective or deem our opinion as superior to others will often turn into a source of bias.
<em>Since people can have different values and culture, we need to accept that our thinking has always some form of bias.</em>
The ethnocentric fallacy is a common habit held when we think in terms of our background, which is not necessarily held by others, as view or tendency to explain the behaviour our attitude, thinking that the rest of the people will mistakenly held our same cultural values.
We tend to compare to other races and consider our assumptions and expectations as superior to the rest of the cultures.
<em>We must recognize that this is another form of bias and that has negative consequences on the long term- </em>
I think the answer is true, but I'm not really sure
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
Answer:
France ceded Louisiana to Spain
Explanation:
