The answer to the question above is b. Hobbes believed that people were naturally evil, while Locke did not.
The answer to this question is
<span>Which of these Renaissance ideas does this passage support? And you are to understand that a Prince, and most of all a new Prince, cannot observe all those rules of conduct in respect whereof men are accounted good, being often forced, in order to preserve his Princedom, to act in opposition to good faith, charity, humanity, and religion. He must therefore keep his mind ready to shift as the winds and tides of Fortune turn, and, as I have already said, he ought not to quit good courses if he can help it, but should know how to follow evil courses if he must. —Niccolò Machiavelli
</span>D-"Secularism"
Hoped This Helped, <span>Isaiahborg2
Your Welcome :)</span>
I’ve never read the story but you can say that forcing her to cut her hair makes her “fit in” with the other people more and takes away from her original culture since she doesn’t physically have anything left to show about her true culture. she might try to start hiding her culture now because people are making her think that she needs to. in the future, she might make her kids cut their hair too and they might make their kids cut their hair etc. etc. which then makes the tradition of long hair eventually fade away.
The production of cars they made them one way more affordable without options for mass production
