Answer:
A F% isn't even a thing lol. But what do u need help with
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
9900 because you divide 99000 by 10
Answer:
it looks like -7
Step-by-step explanation:
i just went to x=-4 and went to the nearest point from there
hope this is correct and helps
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
73x=0
Let's allow ?=x because we need an unknown number.
x=0/73=0
x=0
