The true statement of the tribes of the Great Basin are
- Many were part of the Shoshonean language family.
- Relatively few tribes lived there compared to California.
- The Utes were a powerful tribe.
- The food supply of the Digger Indians was precarious.
- They included the Paiute, Gosiute, and Koso people
<h3>What are
tribes of the
Great Basin?</h3>
These tribes have historically occupied the Great Basin the modern descendents of these people are still here today and they includes the Western Shoshone , the Goshute, the Ute, the Paiute and the Washoe.
One of the popular Great Basin Indians belief was that animal ancestors such as Wolf, Coyote, Rabbit, Bear, and Mountain Lion lived before the human age and that they were able to speak and act as humans do.
However, the true statement of the tribes of the Great Basin are Many were part of the Shoshonean language family, Relatively few tribes lived there compared to California, The Utes were a powerful tribe, The food supply of the Digger Indians was precarious and They included the Paiute, Gosiute, and Koso people.
Read more about Great Basin tribe
brainly.com/question/13372070
#SPJ1
Answer:
Difficult for him to deal with
The answer would be D) Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
Selma to <span>Birmingham affair
JFK was the president who would have desired to end racism in America, having been a victim of racism himself, however who found himself tied by political and party affiliations to do something against racism. he also voted against Eisehower civil rights bill in 1957, but made a turn once he became Democratic nominee.
</span>
