Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.
Answer:
A phrase that explains why.
Explanation:
A phrase that explains why would be very helpful because the claim that you have is really just stating your opinion so you need to have at least 3 facts to support your opinion.
- You already have a phrase that states you opinion.
- The sentence that repeats the claim would come at the end of the essay.
And a sentence that argues against the claim would only be useful if you we disagreeing with the claim and trying to prove that Ramses II was <u>NOT </u> the most influential Pharaoh.
An important difference between the freedom rides and unauthorized marches were Freedom rides were testing whether an existing law would be upheld, while unauthorized marches were intentionally breaking an unjust law. The correct answer is C.
<span>Gandhi inspired many people to stand up for rights by using his clever method of nonviolent civil disobedience.</span>
Maybe because they both had different perspectives about it.
