Answer:
The passage is trying to persuade readers to resist negative peer pressure.
Explanation:
The passage explains that peer pressure is a part of life for kids and is sure to happen sometime in their lives. It also states that peer pressure is not all bad because there can be positive and negative peer pressure.
Children were urged to resist negative peer pressure for just one bad decision made, can destroy a person's life for good. They were also encouraged to join a group that helps children resist peer pressure while still having good fun.
<span>Well, he starts off by justifying his reasons with patriotism. "Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy." He also uses facts and promises of a brighter future to gain an audience. "75% of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that it's been in 8 years. Last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past 16 years." We also see more facts in his closing statements, "But with only 2% of the world's oil reserves, oil isn't enough"
He then inadvertently talks about different types of energy sources. These being clean, reliable and opening jobs. This passively emphasizes that we need clean energy for ambiguous reasons, such as global warming and pollutants. It also gives the listeners hope of an increase in the job market. We know that America has had low job-rates lately, so the possibility of new jobs sparks a fire in the heart's of the people. Also, he mentions the gas will be cheaper, which is big, too, since our economy has gone through inflation and a financial depression, and because of this gas has skyrocketed. Cheaper gas motivates people to invest (Taxes?) in these new ideologies and technologies.
Hope this helps :)</span>
This view is not plausible because god is not plausible.
I believe you meant to say is instead on us and that would mean a spelling pattern is a repeated form
Answer:
The war was started by the leaders of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Vienna seized the opportunity presented by the assassination of the archduke to attempt to destroy its Balkan rival Serbia
or
The simplest answer is that the immediate cause was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria-Hungary. His death at the hands of Gavrilo Princip – a Serbian nationalist with ties to the secretive military group known as the Black Hand – propelled the major European military powers towards war.
which ever answer you like best
hope this helps
have a good day :)
Explanation:
