Answer:
Semantic Differential is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Textile industry
Explanation:
They were the first to industrialize.
Answer:
The treaty helped create economic ties between the U.S. and Great Britain.
Explanation:
The 1794 peace treaty signed by Great Britain and the U.S. as a result of the need to prevent a possible war between the nations. Moreover, it was also needed to negotiate a peaceful solution to solve the problem between the two nations without the need to resort to any fighting.
The result of this effort was Jay's Treaty signed in London by John Jay and Lord Grenville. It settled the outstanding conflict between the nations and also provided a more peaceful method of creating economic ties between them. But at the same time, it only triggered the relationship between America and France, who took it as a violation of their peace treaty, the Franco-American mutual defense treaty of 1778.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
