The chief executive is part of the legislative branch
If I was the construction worker I would get tools such as “ pickaxe, chisels, granite hammers, dolerite, and other stone tools to help me brake and shape things. Then I will bring a will barrow to help move have objects around the place.
Answer: C
Explanation: they do not always generate immediate financial gains to the organization. It take a while for it to have that awareness needed to grow the company.
The correct answer would be option A, Confirmation Bias.
At the same time, Fantasia ignores any evidence that people without blue eyes might display exceptionally creativity. This is called a Confirmation Bias.
Explanation:
When a person gives more importance to new evidence that supports his already existing belief, it is called as the Confirmation Bias.
In psychology, it is a tendency of a person to search and support for evidences in order to confirm his preconceptions.
When a person has a direct influence of his own desires on beliefs and concepts, confirmation bias is most likely to occur. It means that when people desire to have a certain idea or concept to be true, they end up believing it to be true.
Just given in the question, Fantasia believes that people with blue eyes are more creative than other people having any other eye color, and when she meets a person with blue eyes who is really creative, her belief gets stronger and she puts more importance to her evidence supporting her already existing belief. At the same time, she ignores any evidence that people without blue eyes might display exceptional creativity. This is the Confirmation Bias.
Learn more about Confirmation Bias at:
brainly.com/question/459129
#LearnWithBrainly
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
