Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
I would think it would be the bill of rights
The answer that will fill in the blanks is that engaging in
full-time work. It is because it has been found out that after the year of
1995, the adults who aged sixty five years older and above in the place of
workforce has resulted a rose substantially when they engage in having to work
full time.
Lakoff argues that the differences in opinions between liberals and conservatives observe from the truth that they subscribe with one-of-a-kind energy to two special valuable metaphors about the relationship of the kingdom to its citizens. both, he claims, see governance via metaphors of the family.
Robin Tolmach Lakoff (/ˈleɪokayɒf/; born November 27, 1942) is a professor emeritus of linguistics at the college of California, Berkeley. Her 1975 e-book Language and woman's area is frequently credited for making language and gender a primary debate in linguistics and different disciplines.
Lakoff advised that those variations she noticed were part of 'girls' Language' and become preferred visible as not as good as men. The 'Deficit version' refers to how this language use contributes to women's lower status and weaker function in society.
Learn more about Lakoff here:
brainly.com/question/17751794
#SPJ9
Answer:
Joint tenancy
Explanation:
Joint tenancy -
It refers to as the legal arrangement , where each of the member has the proper and equal right for the property , is referred to as joint tenancy .
It is a legal order , which need to be followed by all of the head or owner of the property or business .
In the scenario if one of the owner dies , the right is given to the survivors , without the case being carried to the court .
Hence , from the given question ,
The correct answer is joint tenancy .
