Kawamura, a careful utility maximizer, consumes peanut butter and ice cream. Assume that both peanut butter and ice cream are no
rmal goods and that diminishing marginal utility applies to both goods. Right after he achieves the utility-maximizing level of consumption of the two goods, the price of peanut butter falls. After he adjusts to this event, the marginal utility of peanut butter goes _____ and that of ice cream goes _____.
The marginal utility of peanut butter goes <u>down</u> and that of ice cream goes <u>up</u>.
Explanation:
The substitution effect states that when the price of a product falls, it will lead to a rise in the quantity demanded of the product as buyers will buy more of the product that is now relatively cheaper.
And as more of a good is bought, its marginal utility falls. And as less of a product is bought, its marginal utility increases.
Based on the above explanation therefore, the marginal utility of peanut butter goes <u>down</u> and that of ice cream goes <u>up</u> after Kawamura adjusts to the event.
This is because as more of peanut butter is bought due to the fall in its price, its marginal utility falls. And as less of ice cream is bought as it is now relatively more expensive, its marginal utility increases.
The correct answer is Canada, the United States, and Mexico
Explanation:
The North American Free Trade Agreement or NAFTA was an economic alliance between three important countries: Canada, the United States, and Mexico (main countries in North America). Additionally, the purpose of this alliance was to facilitate trade between these countries, and in this way promote the development of the economy in these territories. In terms of history, all countries signed for the agreement in 1992, but the alliance was official only in 1993 because of the opposition of some citizens and groups. Thus, in 1992 Canada, the United States, and Mexico signed this agreement.
Benefit-cost ratio BCR can be expressed in monetary or qualitative terms. It presents the relationship between the relative costs and benefits of a proposed project.
If a project has a BCR greater than 1.0, the project is expected to be attractiveto a firm and its investors.
If a project's BCR is less than 1.0, the project's costs outweigh the benefits, and it should not be considered because it is unattractive.
