Answer:
- Sacred consumption
- Profane consumption
Explanation:
This differentiation is based on special religious events (e.g. religious holidays) that considered some goods as sacred, while profane had to do with everyday life.
Some modern marketing strategies try to build sacred brands. For example, Google has become our God of all knowledge and no one even dares to challenge that almost religious belief. Anyone can make their own coffee or buy coffee at any coffee shop, but Starbucks is different, it has built a sense of emotional connection with the public. It's not any coffee that we need or want.
Answer:
8.91%
Explanation:
In this question We applied the Rate formula which is presented in the attachment below:
Data given in the question
PMT = 1,000 × 9.5% ÷ 2 = $47.50
NPER = 18 years - 2 years × 2 = 32 years
Present value = $1000 × 105% = $1,050
Assuming figure - Future value = $1,000
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the yield to maturity is 8.91%
The answer is d. If he is addressing it publicly. ?
the advantages are that they have more products for more people and a broad range to make sure that people find what their looking for.
the disadvantages are that the company will have less of all of the items, the resources might be strained after all the items are made, all of the items could cost too much, and some other businesses might not like you entering the market, so they may launch the same items you are launching just with a retailed name and a lower price.
If this helps you then plz mark me the brainliest answer. ;)
Answer:
Gene's Gloves was given the right to dump 5,000 gallons of harmful chemicals. It will need to spend $10,000 ($1 per gallon x 10,000 gallons) to substitute harmful chemicals for harmless chemicals in order to keep working.
Wally's Wallet was also given the right to dump 5,000 gallons of harmful chemicals. It will need $60,000 ($3 per gallon x 20,000 gallons) to treat those chemicals and turn them harmless in order to keep working.
If Gene can sell its right to dump 5,000 gallons to Wally, for a price higher than $5,000 but lower than $15,000, both companies would win:
Gene would spend $15,000 in harmless chemicals but it would have between $5,001 and $14,999 in revenue from the selling of "pollution rights".
Wally will spend $45,000 in treating harmful chemicals but it will have to pay Gene between $5,001 and $14,999 for buying their "pollution rights".
