Answer:The statement “No students should be expelled from school” has so little words but huge meaning to me. Although my opinion to agree or disagree with this statement truely depends on the situation, the tone and voice of this statement does not. I believe that this has a straight forward and set down tone. Almost making the statement seem like it's talking to you. Telling you what is right and what is wrong. It may be short and possibly underdeveloped but it does not hold back on the brain. Even with having an ever changing opinion on this topic I still can feel that essance of an answer coming from it. As if the statement it self is the answer regardless of what I have to say.
With my opinion not yet in hand I must say I agree with this statement. That no students should be expelled from school. For no reason at all unless it is a legal concern. Meaning that unless somebody’s rights are being taken away or violated in an illegal fashion this rule should always apply. Considering we as humans have many rights applying towards us such as the 1st amendment being Freedom Of Speech it's just apparent that this should apply to everyone. Not just my school or the nearest school but every school in the united states. So it's not just my opinion but the constitution and laws opinion that no student should be expelled, but thats only considering ONE of the many reasons to this opinion of mine. There are so many logical reasons as to why I 100% agree with the statement “No Students should be expelled from school.”
Explanation:
Now I know this is knowhere near perfect at all but I wrote this as fast as I could to prevent atleast getting an F.
<span>
The word "Abnormal" is made up of the prefix "ab" which means away from, and "normal". So the word "Abnormal" means not normal.</span>
<span />
APEX 2018- C.) The Desire to improve education leads to a future in which students have to take aptitude tests as early as preschool.
Answer:
I would say the final choice is the correct answer as the punctuation appears appropriate and should make sense in a typical context.
Explanation:
Of those offered, flashback is the most used in this selection. The other choices have to be very carefully discussed to be eliminated, however we have to defend flashback as well.
He is thinking back to a time -- pre monster -- where all was good and all was well and he was happy with his bride. Now he thinks only of revenge. He wants only to murder the monster as the monster has done to his family. He is cataloging his current feelings with those of the past.
It is not stream of consciousness. The technique had not been developed yet. This is well organized and on one topic. Stream of consciousness doesn't work that way.
foil
It is not a foil that has been created. Frankenstein hates the creation. It has robbed him of everything that is dear to him (his family mostly). A foil is not a strong enough description of the monster. He has not been created to give us incite into Frankenstein. The monster is a full blown antagonist.
Flash Forward.
The device used is flash back, not flash forward. Not in this section anyway. He is looking backwards when he gets to feel the joy of having his family. He gets this joy in sleep and he dreams of what they were. They are happy people in his dreams.
Paradox
A paradox is a contradiction that still is true. My favorite is "This sentence is false." If it is false, then it's true. And if it is true then the statement is false. You can't win.
It is not a paradox. Frankenstein's feelings are very straight forward.
