Answer: Economic imperative
Explanation: The economic imperative is, in fact, changeable, and it is a set of principles that governs the company in order to achieve the best possible strategy in the market. This is therefore a principle that changes as market conditions change, in line with the needs of the market, that is, customers. Thus, the business strategy changes from the national to the global level, in parallel with changes in cultural values and time. Thus, with these changes, the economic imperative is also changing in order to make a profit, so the company is also guided by the needs of both the national and global market, together with the conditions and trends of the time and consumer culture of the time.
So Russ is guided by the company's policies, that is, his economic imperative travels the world to present his company's products as a seller globally. This means the trend of time and consumer culture and values are such that according to the products of his company he sells, he has to travel globally.
They are called amendments. The first 10 are the Bill of Rights.
11.R hope I helped I will try to get more information later
Inelastic skin turgor is a normal part of aging you should remember when evaluating skin turgor.
Chronic hypocalcemia is often due to insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone or vitamin D or resistance to these hormones. Treatment focuses on oral calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and magnesium if deficient.
Back and leg muscle spasms are common. Over time, hypocalcemia can affect the brain, causing neurological or psychological symptoms such as confusion, memory loss, delirium, depression, and hallucinations. These symptoms disappear when calcium levels are restored.
Hypocalcemia may be due to vitamin D deficiency. It may also indicate the condition of his four small glands in the neck (parathyroid glands), kidneys, or skin turgor.
Learn more about hypocalcemia at
brainly.com/question/4337966
#SPJ4
That statement is true
If fishing related activities are left unregulated by the government, fishers could utilize dangerous method such as using bombs that might destroy the ecosystem in the fresh water. This could make the fish population in a certain area become extinct.
Regulating fishing in freshwater would prevent such things from happening. This create positive economic impact by ensuring that the source of income would not be eliminated from the destruction of environment.
