Answer:
b. can seek a retraction, but can never recover damages for defamation
Explanation:
- A defamation is a clumpy oral or written communication about a false statement and that can unjustly harm the reputation and is usually consider to be a crime and some of the deface to claim.
- The case of the defamation are the statements that are made in the good faiths and in the reasonable beliefs are a true and fair commitment on matters of the public interest and involves no third party communication.
<u>City requirement</u> refers to agglomerated settlement whose inhabitants are primarily engaged in non-agricultural activities.
<u>Explanation</u>:
A place is said to be city if the urban settlement has been legally incorporated into an independent self-government.
The activities that are not related to agriculture are known as non-agricultural activities. Construction, mining, handicrafts, transport etc. are some of the non-agricultural activities.
The central of the city and its surrounding suburban areas are concluded as urbanized area. The urban area is crowded with heavy population and buildings. The people in the city are mostly engaged into activities other than agriculture.
In the virtual reality environment, patients see, hear and smell familiar scenes that may be related to their trauma. This therapeutic approach aims to assist in the formation of mental images in individuals to solve their problems.
Post traumatic stress disorder is a condition that occurs in people who have experienced negative events such as violence, disasters and the death of family members.
This condition can have negative consequences for the individual's life, who can develop anxiety and depression.
Therefore, through the use of virtual reality and exposure therapy, patients experience a controlled environment related to their traumas, in order to face their fears and change their conditioned responses.
Learn more about exposure therapy here:
brainly.com/question/5557547
Answer:
What made the Great Depression "Great" was the government response. Constant changes the regulatory environment, tax increases, massive deficits, and failure to let the market correct paralyzed the economy in its depressed state for 15 years.
Both were caused primarily by an over expansion of credit rooted in loose money supply. The monetary response to the current recession has been different. Rather than tightening to force the market to bottom, the Fed has maintained low rates in an effort to re-inflate the bubble conditions. Hoover/Bush & FDR/Obama responses are similar as all tried to spend their way out of the problem.
1929 crash:
After WWI, Britain reset the pound to the pre-WWI level even though their money supply had far exceeded pre-WWI levels. In an effort to slow the flight of gold from Britain, the US federal reserve (led by Benjamin Strong) lowered interest rates. As always, artificially low interest rates caused massive distortions in asset values. Money flowed into the stock market and people who would not normally have been stockholders bought stocks in place of other investments that would have yielded better interest rates absent fed policy. Margin was used excessively because the real cost of leveraging was distorted by fed interest rate policy.
The fed continually lowered interest rates all the way into 1929. When the bubble popped, they tightened policy and raised rates. This contributed the deflationary spiral; however, the deflationary spiral could not have been as severe without the loose policy during the bubble.
2008 crash:
Beginning in the early 1990s, the federal reserve (led by Alan Greenspan) lowered rates while monitoring consumer prices as indicators of inflation. They ignored bubbles in the stock market directly caused by their inflationary monetary policy. When the stock bubble popped, they lowered rates further and pushed misdirected investment towards other assets - most commonly housing.
After the attacks of 9/11/2001, the fed pushed rates to 0 (long term rates were effectively negative and continue to be).
Explanation:
There is no single restoration solution that will solve Louisiana’s land loss crisis. Maintaining as much of Louisiana’s coast as possible will require a suite of restoration projects and programs planned and operated together to maximize their effectiveness and benefits over time, allowing land to be built and sustained in a way that surpasses the benefits of any single project or project type
