I believe the answer you are looking for is Primacy Effect, hope this helps!
How far would you let the government go in examining people's private lives depends on the situation at hand. When it comes to sexual incidents and murder allegations, I think it's appropriate for states to share their crime databases. These are cases that the public should be aware of because it's not every time someone walks out or gets paroled for something and never commits that crime again.
As for other crimes, I see no reason to share this. It can cause problems for the person's self-development. I also think it crosses the line of abusing power to access this information. The concept of trading privacy for security makes sense when used for legitimate purposes, but it's always gone too far and distorts your view of what it means to trade privacy for security.
Know more about privacy here
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
A good citizen never breaks the law and is always kind and considerate to other citizens. A bad citizen does not abide by the law and can be nasty towards others.
Nothing to help alot of animals
I think the answer is self employment income but that is if your selling something and receiving money for it on your own time(not at a workplace)
